Why Gold-Related Investments Are Slowly Becoming Worthless

Recently I received a comment from someone who claimed former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has suggested we should abandon the Federal Reserve and move back to gold or adopt a "currency board."

Does that mean investors should take another look at gold? At buying gold-related stocks and funds such as Sandstorm (SNDXF.PK), Royal Gold (RGLD), Global X (GGGG), Direxion (DUST) and Market Vectors (GDX)?

The Pros and Cons of Gold

On the plus side for gold we all know it is virtually indestructible and that the supply only increases slowly as new gold is mined. On the other hand, we also know that the world is changing and that, unlike bonds and other assets, gold earns no income and has costs associated with its storage.

Today there is a market for gold and it exists for a number of reasons - because gold is demanded as a "safe haven" or store of value, for jewelry particularly in countries such as India, for certain industrial applications, and for false teeth. Indeed, in countries such as India and other underdeveloped countries gold often does a double duty as both jewelry and a way by which women can accumulate an indestructible store of relatively liquid assets.

Moreover, some people and politicians, for example Congressman Ron Paul, believe the value of the dollar would be enhanced and stabilized by the restoration of the gold standard or some other connection between the dollar and gold. Should such a connection be reestablished they are correct in thinking that there would be a dramatic increase in the demand for gold and its price would undoubtedly rise.

On the supply side there is a general understanding that the market is affected by the huge stock of gold jewelry, which can be quickly sold as jewelry or melted down and resold as raw gold, by sales of the gold held by people as a store of value when they find other ways to store value such as in stocks and bonds, by sales of stocks accumulated by traders such as John Paulson's hedge fund, and by the continuing mining of gold.

Particularly overhanging the supply side of the gold market are the huge gold reserves countries such as the United States still hold in their vaults from the days when their currencies were backed by gold. For example, the central banks of euro-challenged countries Greece, Italy, Spain and Prortugal hold in excess of 3000 tons. A good part of that tonnage is almost certain to end up on the market in the near future.

Many other countries also hold substantial amounts of idle gold from the days it backed their currencies. The United States alone holds more than 370 million ounces, some of it in trust for other nations and organizations. These reserves once backed the dollar and other currencies. Today they are sitting idle in the vaults of Fort Knox and the New York Federal Reserve Bank. These and similar reserves around the world, since they now serve no identifiable purpose, are virtually certain to hit the market sooner or later.

Where is the price of gold headed?


The basic answer is that in the long run the price of gold can only go down. And it will keep going down until mining virtually stops. This will occur as the world's economies and banking systems continue to modernize and gold long-held in vaults to back currencies comes on the market. As it stands, in the long run the price of gold will almost certainly fall as the supply in the market continually increases far faster than the demand.

The long-run decline is under way for a number of reasons. For example, modern dentistry now relies on other commodities for false teeth; access to banks and stock markets and other assets is spreading rapidly in gold buying countries such India so that women, as women already do in the West, can now hold their assets in banks and securities and other assets instead of wearing them.

Also in the long run, the older less knowledgeable generations of Geithners and Ron Pauls will pass out of positions of power - so that the kinds of uncertainty and ignorant national and central bank decisions now triggering economic collapse, such as those now prevailing in the United States, will finally cease, thus ending the demand for gold as a safe haven for investor's wealth.

On the other hand, there is always a substantial time when there are major changes in an economy's culture and knowledge. That's another way of saying that large amounts of gold jewelry are going to be demanded in India and other such countries for years to come. Similarly, the macroeconomically illiterate politicians and central bank appointees of Europe, the U.S., and elsewhere will not give way for years.

But the trend toward sustained prosperity is under way and it means significantly lower gold prices in the future as declining demand meets an increasing supply - not just from increased production through the use of modern mining techniques but also as nations sell their useless reserves and women in underdeveloped countries convert their gold jewelry to income-earning assets such as stocks and bank deposits.

Of course, hanging over the long-term trend of a declining price of gold is the possibility, however remote, that gold will again be used to back national currencies. Also it is possible that more people in desperately poor nations such as India, and Somalia, will become rich enough to start buying jewelry and accumulating wealth faster than banks and other investments will become available to them. Such an expansion of the demand for gold would certainly tend to increase its price by swamping the downward pressures.

Read the full article here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kyle Bass On Rehypothecation And Other Keynesian Endgame Scenarios

Jim Sinclair - CB’s Trying to Keep Gold from Rising Violently